{"id":995,"date":"2019-10-22T21:43:19","date_gmt":"2019-10-22T21:43:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/achangeiscoming.net\/?p=995"},"modified":"2019-10-22T21:43:19","modified_gmt":"2019-10-22T21:43:19","slug":"fisa-news-section-215-sunsetting-december-chance-meaningful-reform","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/2019\/10\/22\/fisa-news-section-215-sunsetting-december-chance-meaningful-reform\/","title":{"rendered":"DRAFT: With FISA abuses in the news, and the USA Freedom Act sunsetting in December, it might get interesting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">DRAFT!\u00a0\u00a0 Feedback welcome!<\/span><\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">Revised version will be published on the <em>Get FISA Right<\/em> blog<\/span><\/p>\n<p>When the Patriot Act was passed in 2001, and again when the FISA Amendment Act was passed in 2008, several key surveillance powers were supposed to &#8220;sunset&#8221; in a few years unless Congress voted to reauthorize them.\u00a0\u00a0 Which Congress has, repeatedly, usually without even introducing significant reforms.<\/p>\n<p>Now it&#8217;s the USA Freedom Act&#8217;s turn to sunset, on December 15 unless it&#8217;s renewed &#8211; specifically the business records (also known as &#8220;Section 215&#8221;, including the bulk collection of call records), roving wiretaps, and &#8220;lone wolf&#8221; provisions.*<\/p>\n<p>As is usually the case in these sunset battles, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fbi.gov\/news\/testimony\/reauthorizing-the-usa-freedom-act-of-2015-110619\">the administration has proposed making all the authorities permanent<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepress.net\/news\/press-releases\/house-members-call-urgent-reforms-patriot-act-surveillance-powers\">civil liberties advocates have proposed significant reforms<\/a>; and the likely outcome is somewhere in between.\u00a0 Of course, the impeachment hearings make it hard to predict what&#8217;s going to happen &#8212; how much energy does anybody have to spend on this?\u00a0 But as I wrote back in 2017<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p id=\"bff1\" class=\"graf graf--p graf-after--p\">Urgency increases as we get closer to the sunset mechanism\u2019s looming deadline \u200a\u2014\u200awhich in turn often leads to short-term extensions. It\u2019s like watching sausage getting made, although with a lot more scary headlines and phone calls to Congress.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So buckle up!\u00a0\u00a0 I&#8217;ll go into more detail about the situation, but first a few things you can do right now:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/actionnetwork.org\/letters\/tell-congress-shut-down-unlawful-surveillance-and-repeal-section-215?source=twitter&amp;\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/actionnetwork.org\/letters\/tell-congress-shut-down-unlawful-surveillance-and-repeal-section-215?source=twitter&amp;\">Tell Congress: Shut down unlawful surveillance<\/a> is an easy-to-use forms to ask your Congressional representatives not to extend Section 215, sponsored by organizations including Demand Progress, Fight for the Future, and MediaJustice)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/reform215.org\/#take-action\">Reform 215<\/a> and EFF&#8217;s <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2019\/08\/eff-says-no-trump-administrations-push-renew-section-215-indefinitely\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2019\/08\/eff-says-no-trump-administrations-push-renew-section-215-indefinitely\">Don&#8217;t Renew Section 215 Indefinitely<\/a> also make it easy to contact Congress.<\/li>\n<li>If you&#8217;re on Twitter, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/freepress\/status\/1192097227839135746\">Free Press has made it easy to tweet some key Senate Judiciary Committee members<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As things heat up there will no doubt be plenty of opportunities for grassroots activism.\u00a0 So, stay tuned!\u00a0\u00a0 You can follow Get FISA Right on <a class=\"ez cf gg gh gi gj\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/GetFISARight\/status\/1014575770449031168\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Twitter<\/a> and <a class=\"ez cf gg gh gi gj\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/GetFisaRight\/posts\/841744032682028\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Facebook<\/a>, and of course there other great organizations working on this issue.<\/p>\n<h2>What reformers are asking for<\/h2>\n<p>This year, coalitions of digital rights, social justice, and civil liberties groups took the initiative proposing significant reforms, starting with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pogo.org\/letter\/2019\/03\/broad-coalition-calls-for-patriot-act-surveillance-reform\/\">a letter from 35 groups in March<\/a>.\u00a0 In September, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/news\/2019\/09\/09\/targeting-patriot-act-provision-rights-groups-urge-house-dems-block-nsa-collecting\">30 groups followed up with another strong letter to Congress<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>We urge you to oppose any legislation that would reauthorize Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act unless it repeals the government&#8217;s statutory authority to operate the Call Detail Records (&#8220;CDR&#8221;) program and contains bold reforms to protect individuals against mass surveillance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s support in Congress as well, as seen in a late-October letter from <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.freepress.net\/news\/press-releases\/house-members-call-urgent-reforms-patriot-act-surveillance-powers\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.freepress.net\/news\/press-releases\/house-members-call-urgent-reforms-patriot-act-surveillance-powers\">20 House members<\/a>, led by\u00a0Earl Blumenauer (OR-03) and Rashida Tlaib (MI-13).<\/p>\n<p>More recently, a pair of bombshell court cases published in early October found that the <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/fbis-use-of-foreign-surveillance-tool-violated-americans-privacy-rights-court-found-11570559882?mod=rsswn\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/fbis-use-of-foreign-surveillance-tool-violated-americans-privacy-rights-court-found-11570559882?mod=rsswn\">FBI\u2019s Use of Surveillance Database Violated Americans\u2019 Privacy Rights<\/a> and highlighted ongoing law enforcement abuse.\u00a0 In response, 40 groups &#8212; including Get FISA Right &#8212; have another ask: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/letter\/coalition-letter-urging-reforms-section-702-fisa\">ensure that legislation also includes reforms to FISA Section 702<\/a>, in particular prohibiting backdoor searches and &#8220;abouts&#8221; searches.***<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s an impressively broad list of groups involved with these various letters, and online campaigns like <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/actionnetwork.org\/letters\/tell-congress-shut-down-unlawful-surveillance-and-repeal-section-215?source=twitter&amp;\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/actionnetwork.org\/letters\/tell-congress-shut-down-unlawful-surveillance-and-repeal-section-215?source=twitter&amp;\">Tell Congress: Shut down unlawful surveillance<\/a>: Color of Change, Defending Rights and Dissent, Fight for the Future, Million Hoodies Movement for Justice, Restore the Fourth, EPIC Privacy, the NAACP, Free Press Action, Demand Progress, CD , ACLU,\u00a0 Indivisible, FreedomWorks, and dozens more.\u00a0\u00a0 Then again, the surveillance-industrial complex also has broad support.<\/p>\n<p>So pro-surveillance forces will do their best to push through an extension without any reforms &#8212; or, as the Trump administration proposes, make the powers permanent.<\/p>\n<h2>It might get very interesting<\/h2>\n<p>With Congress&#8217; winter recess scheduled to start December 12, there aren&#8217;t a lot of working days left before.\u00a0\u00a0 In the past, Congress has passed a short-term extension to buy more time &#8212; but that will require a majority, so gives reformers a lot of leverage if they decide to exercise it.\u00a0\u00a0 So it might get very interesting.<\/p>\n<p>The politics are certainly different than they&#8217;ve been in the past.\u00a0 Let&#8217;s start with the Republicans, who are currently up in arms over claimed FISA abuses targeting people in the Trump campaign and administration.\u00a0 As <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/normative\/status\/1192133708481990656\">Julian Sanchez says<\/a>,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span class=\"css-901oao css-16my406 r-1qd0xha r-ad9z0x r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0\">If you believe a small handful of bad actors managed to so thoroughly game all the layers of oversight that improper political surveillance <strong>was even reauthorized by the new administration it targeted<\/strong>, that would be pretty damning proof that the system is broken.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So you&#8217;d think that a lot more Republicans would be on the side of reform this time around, even more than the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/blog\/house-votes-reauthorize-fisa-section-702-mass-surveillance-program\">58 House Republicans who backed the Amash-Lofgren amendments<\/a> in 2017.\u00a0\u00a0 Inspector General David Horowitz, who has a good reputation, is expected to issue a report on these abuses.\u00a0 Given the intelligence agencies&#8217; track record, I wouldn&#8217;t be at all surprised if he finds they&#8217;ve been cutting corners and perhaps even blatantly ignoring the rules, so there&#8217;s likely to be more fuel for the fire.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, with Democrats concerns about abuse of power by the Trump administration, you&#8217;d think that some of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govtrack.us\/congress\/votes\/115-2018\/h16\">65 House Democrats (including Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff) who voted in 2017 to give the Trump administration an extension of powers with no new safeguards<\/a>** might take a stronger pro-civil liberties stance?\u00a0 On top of that, several Democrats who are usually strong supporters of surveillance are facing primary challengers &#8212; like Mckayla Wilkes, going up against Steny Hoyer; and\u00a0former Get FISA Right member Shahid Buttar, running against Nancy Pelosi.\u00a0 Will that help tip the scales?<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/news\/trump-administration-shows-usa-freedom-hearing-without-answers-key-questions-data-collection\">November 6 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing<\/a> featured a lot of questions about the CDR program**** &#8212; <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AlexEmmons\/status\/1192099953927168001\">even Dianne Feinstein expresse skepticism!<\/a>\u00a0 It also featured another great example of bad behavior by intelligence agencies; Senators Mike Lee and Patrick Leahy had written to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence back in December 2018 seeking answers, but still haven&#8217;t gotten any responses.\u00a0 Lee was irritated enough that he threatened monthly hearings.\u00a0 Other topics didn&#8217;t get a lot of attention; live-tweeting from <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/emptywheel\/status\/1192098762212159488\">Marcy Wheeler<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/normative\/status\/1192083784939851777\">Julian Sanchez<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EFFLive\/status\/1192106922616295426\">EFF<\/a> has more detail.<\/p>\n<p>Next steps include committee votes (and perhaps additional hearings) in the House and Senate.\u00a0\u00a0 Here&#8217;s a place where grassroots activism can make a difference, pressuring Congresspeople of both parties.\u00a0 Of course, there&#8217;s lots of other stuff going on; even though the Democrat\/Libertarian coalition may well have enough votes in the House to get reform, Speaker Pelosi may not want to prioritize this fight right now &#8212; or pro-surveillance forces may try to take advantage of the opportunity to sneak something through.\u00a0 We shall see.<\/p>\n<p>Like I said, it should be interesting!<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>* Bobby Chesney&#8217;s <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfareblog.com\/three-fisa-authorities-sunset-december-heres-what-you-need-know\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfareblog.com\/three-fisa-authorities-sunset-december-heres-what-you-need-know\">Three FISA Authorities Sunset in December: Here\u2019s What You Need to Know<\/a>, from early this year, is a good discussion of these three provisions.\u00a0\u00a0 It&#8217;s interesting to look back at how these same debates were framed in earlier reauthorization battles; for example, here&#8217;s a pair of Julian Sanchez articles from 2009 arguing against renewing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/blog\/patriot-powers-roving-wiretaps\">roving wiretaps<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2009\/10\/05\/should-the-patriot-act-keep-lo\/\">lone wolves<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>** If you&#8217;re wondering why this is titled Rapid DNA Act of 2017, well, at some point, for some obscure parliamentary procedure reasons, S. 139 (which was originally the Rapid DNA Act) was completely replaced with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/115th-congress\/senate-bill\/139\">FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017<\/a>\u00a0but even though the text of the House version of S.139 changed, the title didn&#8217;t.\u00a0 So if you try to find the House version of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act on congress.gov, you find Devin Nunes&#8217; H.R.4478, which never got voted on. Meanwhile, the Rapid DNA Act that passed the House was H.R. 510.\u00a0 See why I say it&#8217;s like watching sausage getting made?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>*** Jennifer Stisa Granick and Ashley Gorski have some other good suggested reforms, as well as a detailed analysis, in <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/66622\/how-to-address-newly-revealed-abuses-of-section-702-surveillance\/\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/66622\/how-to-address-newly-revealed-abuses-of-section-702-surveillance\/\">How to Address Newly Revealed Abuses of Section 702 Surveillance<\/a>.\u00a0 Marcy Wheeler&#8217;s <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.emptywheel.net\/2019\/10\/18\/surveillance-reform-can-no-longer-ignore-eo-12333\/\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.emptywheel.net\/2019\/10\/18\/surveillance-reform-can-no-longer-ignore-eo-12333\/\">Surveillance Reform Can No Longer Ignore EO 12333<\/a> also makes an important point.<\/p>\n<p>****\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pclob.gov\/library\/PCLOB%20testimony%20Landau.pdf\">Susan Landau&#8217;s testimony to the PCLOB<\/a> is a deep dive into the call-records aspect of Section 215, summarized in <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfareblog.com\/section-215-no-longer-worth-effort\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfareblog.com\/section-215-no-longer-worth-effort\">Is Section 215 No Longer Worth the Effort?<\/a>.\u00a0 Devlin Bartlett and Ellen Nakashima&#8217;s <a class=\"hoverable\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/democrats-dubious-of-trump-administrations-push-to-renew-controversial-spy-power\/2019\/09\/18\/8f29b1c6-da1d-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/democrats-dubious-of-trump-administrations-push-to-renew-controversial-spy-power\/2019\/09\/18\/8f29b1c6-da1d-11e9-ac63-3016711543fe_story.html\">Democrats dubious of Trump administration\u2019s push to renew controversial spy power<\/a> is from late September, so a little dated, but has a good overview of the landscape.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DRAFT!\u00a0\u00a0 Feedback welcome! Revised version will be published on the Get FISA Right blog When the Patriot Act was passed in 2001, and again when the FISA Amendment Act was passed in 2008, several key surveillance powers were supposed to &#8220;sunset&#8221; in a few years unless Congress voted to reauthorize them.\u00a0\u00a0 Which Congress has, repeatedly, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[420],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drafts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}