{"id":72,"date":"2008-01-21T09:33:40","date_gmt":"2008-01-21T16:33:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.talesfromthe.net\/jon\/?p=72"},"modified":"2008-01-21T09:33:40","modified_gmt":"2008-01-21T16:33:40","slug":"democratic-candidates-positions-on-trans-and-lbgtiq-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/2008\/01\/21\/democratic-candidates-positions-on-trans-and-lbgtiq-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Democratic candidates&#8217; positions on trans- and LBGTIQ issues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>All the Democratic candidates have shown a willingness to discuss LBGTIQ issues, and there are some very clear litmus tests.  The Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell policy mandating discrimination against gays in the military and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) restricting marriage to heterosexual couples are great lenses for discovering the candidates&#8217; views on LGB issues, and last fall&#8217;s craven decision by Democratic leadership (endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign) to advance a non-inclusive version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act [ENDA] has added an equally good one on the trans front.  So it&#8217;s unusually clear where they stand &#8212; and there are some significant differences.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->There are some very clear distinctions on ENDA: Obama and Edwards support the trans-inclusive view, and unsurprisingly to me, given her husband&#8217;s advice to John Kerry in 2004 to throw the GLBT community under the bus on same-sex marriage, <a href=\"http:\/\/visiblevote08.logoonline.com\/2007\/11\/13\/barney-endorses-hillary-enda-anyone\/\">Hillary Clinton&#8217;s stance is &#8220;we have to move ENDA forward&#8221; &#8212; very often code &#8220;too bad for you trans folks, my definition of equality doesn&#8217;t include you&#8221;<\/a>. ENDA was of course vetoed, and so didn&#8217;t move forward (and since everybody knew it already, there is absolutely no political value in confirming that Bush, his administration, and all the Congressional Republicans are homophobic).<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, in a November guest post in The Billerico Project (!), <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bilerico.com\/2007\/11\/a_call_for_full_equality.php\">Obama shows he understands the issues, commits to the right position, and has already done the right thing as a state legislator<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As President &#8230;. I will also place the weight of my administration behind the enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act to outlaw hate crimes and a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act to outlaw workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. I have supported fully inclusive protections since my days in the Illinois legislature, when I sponsored a bill to outlaw workplace discrimination that expressly included both sexual orientation and gender identity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pamshouseblend.com\/showDiary.do?diaryId=4178\">Autumn Sandeen&#8217;s post at Pam&#8217;s House Blend<\/a> surveys various quotes by the candidates on these issues and makes the fascinating point: &#8220;The Task Force lists no statements where Clinton says the words transgender or gender identity in a statement supporting civil rights for the transgender community in the present tense.&#8221; About that definition of equality &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Distinctions are equally clear on DOMA, and as well as explaining why it matters, Terrence Heath&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bilerico.com\/2008\/01\/the_doma_difference.php\">The Doma Difference<\/a> describes the candidates&#8217; positions:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If no leading candidate is going to support marriage equality, then the very <em>least<\/em> we can ask and ought to ask of a candidate is that he or she support a full repeal of DOMA, which currently stands as the biggest legislative obstacle to marriage equality. Obama and Edwards, at the very least, support a <em>full<\/em> repeal of DOMA. Clinton, on the other hand, supports a partial repeal of DOMA that would leave an important section of the bill in place, which <a href=\"http:\/\/thomas.loc.gov\/cgi-bin\/query\/D?c104:1:.\/temp\/%7Ec104RT1wqs::\">exempts states from recognizing any same-sex relationship that is &#8220;treated as a marriage&#8221; under the laws of any other state<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.samesexconflicts.com\/blog\/2008\/1\/13\/clinton-and-obama-support-doma-2.html\">Stephen Clark&#8217;s blog post<\/a> describes Obama&#8217;s reasoning behind his position in a little more detail.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, on Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell, all the candidates are against it &#8212; but alas, none take the next step and support universities who ban the military from recruiting as they would any other discriminatory employer. I&#8217;m not sure what their logic is for this (do they see this as an unpleasant but necessary tradeoff given the military&#8217;s difficulties in recruiting?); if there are any discussions, I&#8217;d love pointers.  VisibleVote has a great page with video clips from the debate last August with <a href=\"http:\/\/visiblevote08.logoonline.com\/2007\/08\/10\/the-candidates-weigh-in-on-dont-ask-dont-tell\">the candidates speaking about this issue<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>All the Democratic candidates have shown a willingness to discuss LBGTIQ issues, and there are some very clear litmus tests. The Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell policy mandating discrimination against gays in the military and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) restricting marriage to heterosexual couples are great lenses for discovering the candidates&#8217; views on LGB [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[20,117,137,184,199,368],"class_list":["post-72","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political","tag-2008-election","tag-doma","tag-enda","tag-intersectionality","tag-lbgtq","tag-trans"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}