{"id":2374,"date":"2011-01-23T13:55:18","date_gmt":"2011-01-23T20:55:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.talesfromthe.net\/jon\/?p=2374"},"modified":"2011-01-23T13:55:18","modified_gmt":"2011-01-23T20:55:18","slug":"youre-right-but-for-the-wrong-reasons-a-response-to-vivek-wadhwa-on-quora-hype","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/2011\/01\/23\/youre-right-but-for-the-wrong-reasons-a-response-to-vivek-wadhwa-on-quora-hype\/","title":{"rendered":"Prisms, Kool-Aid, and an Opportunity (a response to Vivek Wadhwa on Quora)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com\/2011\/01\/popping-balloon.jpg?w=219&amp;h=245\" alt=\"a red balloon saying Quora and a pencil about to pop it\" \/><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Silicon Valley is again drinking its own Kool-Aid; it is looking at the world through its own prism.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Vivek Wadhwa on <em>TechCrunch<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Quora has that certain magic that only one or two startups a year have. When it first launched it seemed kinda dumb, a slightly better version of q&amp;a sites from before, that all flailed into spam. But it became exceptionally clear very shortly that it wasn&#8217;t like those other sites. that the product, combined with the launch strategy of concentrating on a certain group of people (which is how facebook launched as well) made for a very nice product. Now the question is can they turn the corner. I think they will.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; <em>TechCrunch <\/em>editor Michael Arrington, in a comment<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oooh, controversy!<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/imitates\">Life imitates art imitates life &#8230;<\/a> I&#8217;ve been talking why I come to the same conclusion as Vivek, so I was looking forward to seeing what he had to say on.\u00c2\u00a0 And there&#8217;s some very good stuff, including an excellent point I hadn&#8217;t seen elsewhere, talking the important of topic-specific and community-oriented Q&amp;A sites:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This is where people with common interests will gather and exchange ideas. \u00c2\u00a0For   example, for people seeking legal advice, there is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawpivot.com\/\">LawPivot<\/a>, and for businesses looking for experts, there is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.focus.com\/\">Focus<\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0For techies, there are sites like <a href=\"http:\/\/stackoverflow.com\/\">StackOverflow<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/slashdot.org\/\">Slashdot<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.ycombinator.com\/\">Hacker News<\/a>; for children, there is <a href=\"http:\/\/togetherville.com\/\">Togetherville<\/a>; for business students, there is <a href=\"http:\/\/poetsandquants.com\/\">PoetsandQuants<\/a>; for entrepreneurs in India, there is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.startupqna.com\/\">StartupQnA<\/a>; for Indian accountants, there is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.caclubindia.com\/\">CAClubIndia<\/a>; and China has its own groups, and so do many other countries.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Indeed!  So I added another bullet to my answer on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quora.com\/How-would-Quora-be-different-if-it-prioritzed-diversity\">How would Quora be different if it prioritized diversity<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->And in the comments, superstar VC Fred Wilson makes a very interesting diversity-related point as well:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>i&#8217;m very bullish on vertical Q&amp;A services as  evidenced by our  investment in stackoverflow, which is a great Q&amp;A  service for  software engineers. stack also has serverfault for tech\/ops  people, and  is building out a whole network of verticals with their  stackexchange  platform<\/p>\n<p>i think quora is doing a great job servicing the  techcrunch crowd  with Q&amp;A needs. can it add other verticals? sure.  should it do that  under one all encompassing service at the quora.com domain? not sure  that&#8217;s a good idea<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So I added something related to that too.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quora.com\/How-would-Quora-be-different-if-it-prioritzed-diversity\">Other ideas welcome<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/rww.readwriteweb.netdna-cdn.com\/enterprise\/images\/question_mark_0111.jpg\" alt=\"two question marks\" align=\"right\" \/>The funny thing is, though, I actually disagree with most of what Vivek is saying in the rest of the article.\u00c2\u00a0 For example, a major thrust of his argument is that he thinks the quality of the answers will inevitably decline.\u00c2\u00a0 Here&#8217;s why:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The people whose opinion I value, such as Quora\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s #1 respondent,\u00c2\u00a0Robert  Scoble, will simply stop posting on the site when they get drowned out  by the noise from the masses. \u00c2\u00a0They will turn away after having their  posts voted down (so that they look less important than their peers) and  being personally subjected to the types of mindless, anonymous attacks  that you see in the comments section of TechCrunch.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Hmm.\u00c2\u00a0 Do I detect a Silicon Valley prism?\u00c2\u00a0 Anyhow &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Yes, if the best posts get voted down everybody will lose interest.\u00c2\u00a0 If posters get attacked, they&#8217;ll leave (and Quora&#8217;s had some incidents already).\u00c2\u00a0 But none of this is inevitable.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Other sites have solved this; and Quora&#8217;s paying attention to all of these things &#8212; with rare exceptions, the tone is a lot more civil than TechCrunch.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But when there are hundreds of answers to a given question, by people  you have never heard of (often with fictitious names), how will you  separate the wheat from the chaff? \u00c2\u00a0And how will you distinguish fact  from fiction? \u00c2\u00a0You certainly can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t trust the rankings of the respondents  when these rankings are themselves generated by Quora users.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Once again, this is a problem that&#8217;s been solved by other sites &#8212; in a variety of ways.\u00c2\u00a0 Naver, Yahoo Answers, Stack Overflow &#8230; all of these sites involve hundreds of answers and people with fictitious names. \u00c2\u00a0 As if by magic, the wheat gets separated.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0  Well-designed crowdsourcing works.\u00c2\u00a0 Q&amp;A is exactly the kind of task where <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/01\/08\/science\/08conv.html\">diverse groups outperform<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Unlike Facebook, where everyone socializes, and Twitter, where ordinary  people tell their friends what they are thinking, a Quora-like tool is  only for those who want to learn what their intellectual peers are  saying on, or to research, a particular topic.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Not really.\u00c2\u00a0 Most of the people who visit a Q&amp;A site come via search or a link, and just want an answer to their question.\u00c2\u00a0 Most of the participants come to give feedback on a piece of knowledge, and then the next step is to contribute something of your own or critique something somebody else has said.\u00c2\u00a0 Quora only needs a relatively-small number of people hanging out there to be incredibly lucrative.<\/p>\n<p>So while I agree with Vivek&#8217;s overall conclusion &#8212; a lot of Kool-Aid is getting drunk here &#8212; my reasoning is different.  Quora&#8217;s key challenge is to broaden their base beyond techie guys.\u00c2\u00a0 They don&#8217;t seem to be doing anything about it.<\/p>\n<p>Look at things from a different prism, as an entrepreneur, this is pretty exciting news.\u00c2\u00a0 The Q&amp;A space is very attractive:\u00c2\u00a0 Yahoo! Answers and Answers.com have been top 20 web sites in the US &#8212; in early 2008 Yahoo Answers! was important enough that Oprah helped promote it and both Democratic presidential candidates posted questions there.*\u00c2\u00a0 And with Google&#8217;s plummeting search quality highlighting the limitations of algorithmic search, there&#8217;s a chunk of the search market up for grabs.\u00c2\u00a0 So it&#8217;s a very cluttered space; check out the lists of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quora.com\/Q-A-Websites\/Who-are-Quoras-main-competitors\">Quora competitors<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quora.com\/What-are-other-Q-A-sites-besides-Quora\">other Q&amp;A sites<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>How to stand out from the pack?\u00c2\u00a0 Well, the most-hyped new general entry is Quora &#8212; who isn&#8217;t paying attention to diversity.\u00c2\u00a0 Their prime contender StackOverflow has <a href=\"http:\/\/stackoverflow.com\/about\/team\">no female developers or designers<\/a> and is starting from its base of excellent sites targeting the rather un-diverse audience of programmers and IT pros.\u00c2\u00a0 So even if one or both of those sites together dominate the market for &#8220;techie guys and others who like the same kinds of user interfaces they do&#8221;, there are plenty of other audiences up for grabs.<\/p>\n<p>Sounds like an opportunity to me.<\/p>\n<p>jon<\/p>\n<p>* <a href=\"..\/?p=111#comment-1063\">Obama&#8217;s had over 17,000 responses<\/a>, although if I recall correctly Oprah got more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Silicon Valley is again drinking its own Kool-Aid; it is looking at the world through its own prism. &#8212; Vivek Wadhwa on TechCrunch Quora has that certain magic that only one or two startups a year have. When it first launched it seemed kinda dumb, a slightly better version of q&amp;a sites from before, that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[204,289,325,357],"class_list":["post-2374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-professional","tag-life-imitates-art","tag-quora","tag-social-networks","tag-techcrunch"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2374"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2374\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}