{"id":2091,"date":"2010-10-30T08:24:05","date_gmt":"2010-10-30T15:24:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.talesfromthe.net\/jon\/?p=2091"},"modified":"2010-10-30T08:24:05","modified_gmt":"2010-10-30T15:24:05","slug":"tissue-turgor-and-the-pink-elephants-in-the-room-draft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/2010\/10\/30\/tissue-turgor-and-the-pink-elephants-in-the-room-draft\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Tissue turgor&#8221; and pink elephants: about Y Combinator (DRAFT)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">DRAFT!  Work in progress!  Feedback welcome<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ycombinator.com\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/farm5.static.flickr.com\/4129\/5107072917_5a16cd6268_o.png\" alt=\"y combinator logo\" width=\"93\" height=\"94\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: verdana; font-size: x-small;\"><em>One advantage startups have over established companies is that there are no discrimination laws about starting businesses. For example, I would be reluctant to start a startup with a woman who had small children, or was likely to have them soon. But you&#8217;re not allowed to ask prospective employees if they plan to have kids soon. Whereas when you&#8217;re starting a company, you can discriminate on any basis you want about who you start it with.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana; font-size: x-small;\">&#8212; Y Combinator founder Paul Graham, in<em> <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.paulgraham.com\/start.html\">How to Start a Startup<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Christopher Steiner&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/forbes\/2010\/1108\/best-small-companies-10-y-combinator-paul-graham-disruptor_print.html\">The Disruptor in the Valley<\/a> in <em>Forbes<\/em> discusses how this essay, along with Paul&#8217;s Harvard talk, eventually inspired red-hot technology incubator YC. He doesn&#8217;t include this quote, alas, and also doesn&#8217;t mention the reports in the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mercurynews.com\/twitter\/ci_15517047?source=rss\">Mercury News<\/a><\/em> and <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/venturecapital\/2010\/08\/27\/addressing-the-lack-of-women-leading-tech-start-ups\/\"><em>Wall Street Journal<\/em><\/a> of YCs #diversityfail or Tereza Nemessanyi&#8217;s <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/terezan.tumblr.com\/post\/816358389\/xx-combinator\">XX Combinator<\/a>.\u00c2\u00a0 I guess they didn&#8217;t fit\u00c2\u00a0 in with the article&#8217;s subtitle: &#8220;Paul Graham&#8217;s Y Combinator has stormed Silicon Valley and pioneered a better way to build a company.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>YC has indeed had a huge impact. \u00c2\u00a0 Christopher reports that YC typically puts about $15-$20K into the  companies in return for a 5% equity stake; with over 400 companies in  their portfolio they&#8217;re a powerful force in the tech startup world.\u00c2\u00a0 With the help of a lot of gushing coverage in the <em>TechCrunch<\/em> and their buddies in the tech press, 30 of their of the 36 startups in the most recent crop incubator have gotten funding since <a href=\"http:\/\/talesfromthe.net\/jon\/?p=905&amp;cpage=1#comment-87399\">Demo Day in August<\/a>, many of them over $1 million.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/tcangelgate\">Collusion is soooo hot these days<\/a> so it&#8217;s as good a time for a fluff piece as any.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Paul&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.paulgraham.com\/superangels.html\">The New Funding Landscape<\/a> predicts that the cozy win\/win\/win dynamics will continue for a while:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: verdana; font-size: x-small;\">The  super-angels will  try to undermine the VCs by acting faster, and the  VCs will try to  undermine the super-angels by driving up valuations.   Which for founders  will result in the perfect combination: funding  rounds that close fast,  with high valuations.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s such a perfect combination for the overhelmingly white male worlds of tech founders, incubators like YC and TechStars, angel and &#8220;super-angel&#8221; investors (many of them ex-entrepreneurs), VCs, and the tech press that covers it all that recently people have started to question whether it&#8217;s a bubble.\u00c2\u00a0 Paul thinks not, and the word doesn&#8217;t come up in Christopher&#8217;s article.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s plenty of good stuff though.\u00c2\u00a0 Jessica Mah, <a href=\"http:\/\/talesfromthe.net\/jon\/?p=905&amp;cpage=1#comment-87399\">co-founder and CEO of inDinero<\/a> and several other YC entrepeneurs have some good perspectives.*\u00c2\u00a0 There&#8217;s also a nice description  of how the YC mafia protect and collaborate with each other and &#8220;regard  Graham as their sensei&#8221;.\u00c2\u00a0 Greg from YC investor Sequoia Capital, <em>TechCrunch&#8217;s <\/em>Michael, and <a href=\"http:\/\/kara.allthingsd.com\/20100924\/boomtown-decodes-ron-conways-super-angel-super-fit-so-you-dont-have-to\/\">AngelGate<\/a> bad and good guys &#8220;foul-mouth Dave&#8221; and Ron (who&#8217;s invested in 20 YC companies and helped Michael sell out to AOL ) all illustrate this nicely in the article, sharing different ways YC is great.\u00c2\u00a0 The early reviews on Hacker News, one of the hubs of the community, laud the article as <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/apps.ycombinator.com\/item?id=1813445\">a great portrait of Paul<\/a> and praise him for &#8220;giving back to the community in such a sustainable, profitable way.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/images.forbes.com\/media\/2010\/10\/20\/1020_p72-paul-graham_398x480.jpg\" alt=\"portrait of Paul Graham\" width=\"114\" height=\"141\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em>The Big Interview <\/em>describes a key  part of the YC selection process: the hot 10-minute session founders go  through with all  five partners bearing down and asking questions at the  same time.\u00c2\u00a0 And no proprietries!\u00c2\u00a0 What does Paul look for?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/forbes\/2010\/1108\/best-small-companies-10-y-combinator-paul-graham-big-interview_print.html\">&#8220;Tissue turgor.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It really paints a picture of the so many meetings in the high-tech  world: a multi-way competition showing off whose smartest and most  powerful and who&#8217;s got the balls, people with the power ganging up on somebody looking for  help, sadism masked with &#8220;it&#8217;s for your own  good.&#8221;\u00c2\u00a0 If YC really feels so terrible about seeing founders&#8217; hands  shaking during the interview, why not create a less hostile  environment?<\/p>\n<p>Paul contributes a side-bar, the all-male <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/forbes\/2010\/1108\/best-small-companies-10-y-combinator-paul-graham-ask-an-expert.html\">What it takes<\/a> (also posted as <a href=\"http:\/\/paulgraham.com\/founders.html\">What We Look for in Founders<\/a>).\u00c2\u00a0 It&#8217;s a very interesting ad, making it clear to founders and investors what YC is selecting and training for. The ideal YC founders are cockroach-like in their determination,** ready to give up on their dreams, intelligent, and naughty. They care about &#8220;big moral questions&#8221;, but aren&#8217;t into &#8220;observing  proprietries.&#8221;  They delight in breaking  rules, although of course not &#8220;rules that matter&#8221; to Paul.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately there isn&#8217;t any discussion the implications of these criteria.\u00c2\u00a0 For example, the YC universe now has hundreds of companies trained in an overwhelmingly-male environment that legitimizes discrimination against women.\u00c2\u00a0 Maybe for them this isn&#8217;t a big moral question and all stuff  about equality is just rules that don&#8217;t matter, but others disagree.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0  What impact does this have on the tech scene as a whole?\u00c2\u00a0 As women in technology continue to improve their skills in highlighting  discrimination, and other incubators emerge, what are the likely implications for YC?<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"pink elephants by Rakka, on Flickr\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/rakka\/33249593\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/23\/33249593_ae04c33c2e_m.jpg\" alt=\"pink elephants\" width=\"150\" height=\"110\" \/><\/a>And speaking of pink elephants, there&#8217;s a huge collective blindspot here.\u00c2\u00a0 YC&#8217;s companies, selected on the basis of criteria that favor young guys and with the mindset that discrimination against women is a competitive advantage, get great training in what it takes to build a product and a business.\u00c2\u00a0 Then they&#8217;re covered by the overwhelmingly-male tech and business press, funded by the overwhelmingly male super-angel and VC worlds, and acquired by companies run and owned mostly by guys those same angels and VCs have invested in.\u00c2\u00a0 Lucky founders then share their wisdom with and invest in the next generation of startups.\u00c2\u00a0 Repeat.<\/p>\n<p>You don&#8217;t by any chance think they&#8217;re collectively missing most of the best opportunities?<\/p>\n<p>As Cindy Gallop says, <a href=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/guysx3\">guys talking to guys about guys<\/a> create a   closed loop where what passes for innovative becomes increasingly less   and less so.\u00c2\u00a0 Paul&#8217;s comments about VCs in footnote 3 of &#8220;The New Funding Landscape&#8221; apply just as well to YC&#8217;s current success:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: verdana; font-size: x-small;\"> They could make it self-perpetuating if they used it to get all the best new startups.  But I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll be able to.  To get all the best startups, you have to do more than make them want you.  You also have to want them; you have to recognize them when you see them, and that&#8217;s much harder. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Indeed.\u00c2\u00a0 YC has gender bias and other forms of discrimination institutionalized so deeply in their culture and their selection criteria that it&#8217;ll be a very disruptive &#8220;pivot&#8221;.\u00c2\u00a0 And probably very entertaining, too!<\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">Update, Jan 2011: Dynamite conclusion still needed :-)\u00c2\u00a0 See the comments for observations about Hacker News since the original draft.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>* although as I discuss at somewhat greater length in a comment in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talesfromthe.net\/jon\/?p=905&amp;cpage=1#comment-98885\">Tissue turgor and Y Combinator&#8217;s secret sauce<\/a>, it would have been great to hear from other women too.\u00c2\u00a0 Most glaringly, Jessica Livingston is Y Combinator co-founder and married to him and she doesn&#8217;t even get a quote and a sidebar?\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 It also would have been nice to hear from Amanda Peay of Message Party, author of <a href=\"http:\/\/amandapeyton.com\/blog\/2010\/09\/im-a-female-y-combinator-founder-and-you-can-be-too\/\">I&#8217;m a Female YC Founder and You Can Be Too<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>** more on founders as cockroaches in Liz Gannes&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/2010\/10\/16\/my-9-favorite-startup-lessons-from-startup-school\/\">summary of the recent YC startup school<\/a> on <em>GigaOm. <\/em>Congrats to <em>GigaOm<\/em> for closing another $2.5 million in funding in <a href=\"http:\/\/venturebeat.com\/2010\/10\/22\/gigaom-raises-2-5m-claims-10000-pro-subscribers\/\">a very cluttered space<em> <\/em><\/a>. \u00c2\u00a0 And while we&#8217;re at it, congrats to Liz who along with Ina Fried is <a href=\"http:\/\/kara.allthingsd.com\/20101021\/atd-gets-social-with-liz-gannes-in-other-words-we-hired-her\/\">joining <em>All Things Digital<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff00ff;\">Image credit: <a title=\"pink elephants by Rakka, on Flickr\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/rakka\/33249593\/\">Pink Elephants<\/a> by Rakka, via <em>Flickr<\/em>, licensed under <em>Creative Commons<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DRAFT! Work in progress! Feedback welcome One advantage startups have over established companies is that there are no discrimination laws about starting businesses. For example, I would be reluctant to start a startup with a woman who had small children, or was likely to have them soon. But you&#8217;re not allowed to ask prospective employees [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[113,148,182,317,411],"class_list":["post-2091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-diversity","tag-feminism","tag-innovation","tag-sexism","tag-yc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2091\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/2024.thenexus.today\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}