TechCrunch, disrupted: the third wave and the agenda of awesome

The third wave embraces contradictions and conflict, and accommodates diversity and change.

— Rosemarie Tong, Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction

The web site for the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco this week credits venture capitalist John Doerr with coining the term “third wave” when Charlie interviewed him at the first Disrupt earlier this year.  John’s not talking about third wave feminism, of course, but the “innovations taking place with social, mobile and commerce platforms and applications”.  In either case it’s hard to argue with Erick’s conclusion on TechCrunch that a panel with John and his partner Bing interviewing Mark of Zynga (TechCrunch’s CEO of the year) is the perfect start for #TCDisrupt.

John’s known for his 2008 quote about the pattern he sees correlated with success: white, male, nerds who have dropped out of prestigious schools and have no social skills. Michael Arrington’s overwhelmingly-white, overwhelmingly-male,  preview The Agenda of Awesome also features the author of The Diversity Myth.and the founder of a social network that’s been described as one of the most sexist sites on the internet.

Awesome.

As well as shameless plugs by and for conference participants, the main news on TechCrunch this last week has been “Angelgate”.  Kara Swisher of BoomTown nicely characterizes it as a “manly hissy fit amongst a passel of white dudes”: a circle-jerk of mutual promotion sparked by Michael’s allegation of collusion by angel investors and “leaked” emails being published.   Guess where?  Meanwhile conference sponsors Google and Intuit have just admitted to collusion with other valley icons including Intel and Apple.

All in all it’s a vivid snapshot of the clubby overwhelmingly-white, overwhelmingly-male network of technologists, bloggers, and investors who have been in the driver’s seat in Silicon Valley for a while now.

WWII image of a woman: Yes we can!But the time’s they are a-changing.

As Allyson Kapin pointed out in last week’s Women Who Tech telesummit, women in technology have made a huge amount of progress storming the clubhouse this last year.  J’ame Ohm, winner of this weekend’s Disrupt Hackathon is a great example.  The all-female panel Tuesday morning discussing women in technology is another.

Fretting, asking, and begging isn’t a plan descries the kerfuffle that led to the panel.  Shira Ovide’s Wall Street Journal article quoted Rachel Sklar of Mediaite and Change the Ratio on the conference’s “overwhelming maleness”. Michael responded sharply with Too Few Women In Tech? Stop Blaming The Men.  Or at least stop blaming me.  Hilarity ensued.

Rachel is on the panel, along with web marketing strategist Michelle Greer, who took the lead (and the brunt of abuse) in the comments in the TechCrunch discussion.  They’re joined by Lauren Leto of Bnter, Leila Chirayath Janah of Samasource, Sara Chipps of Girl Developer, and Cyan Banister of Zivity, who Michael’s quoted as saying “women [stink] as entrepreneurs a lot of the time because they are nurturing and not risk-taking enough by nature”.  Alas, as Zennie Abraham points out on SF Gate, there aren’t any blacks or Latinas on the panel, at least not yet.*  Still, it’s a very good step, potentially analogous to Lynn d Johnson’s 2005 SXSW panel on Blogging While Black, and it should be an interesting range of perspectives.

Between now and then there are all-white guy male sessions on topics like building internet gems, power, the future of venture capital, consumerization of enterprise, and design vs. engineering.  Because, y’know, what could women possibly have to say about any of those subjects?  Oh, and Beth Comstock of GE is speaking about Cultures of Collaboration.  Hopefully she’ll cover the value of diverse teams and an inclusive environment.

White guys are allowed to talk about diversity too, and it’ll be interesting to see whether any of them do.  With women in the majority on most social network sites, avid use of Twitter in the Black and Latin@ communities, and statastics showing what women-led high-tech startups have lower failure rates than those led by men, it seems a mighty important topic for the Silicon Valley elite (and the startups battling it out for $50,000 and the Disrupt Cup) to discuss.

Continued in part 2, Changing the ratio

* or the rest of the conference, as far as I can tell. It looks to me like rapper/CEO Chamillionaire might once again be the only black speaker; see Shireen Mitchell’s perspective on this.


Comments

12 responses to “TechCrunch, disrupted: the third wave and the agenda of awesome”

  1. the place looks like a giant fish marketTechcrunch is being live streamed on @ustream Starts in 15 minutes or so.

    The suspense is killing me.

  2. The left is the “influencers” on the #tcdisrupt hashtag, via Twazzup, right before the conference kicks off … the right’s an audience shot, as John Doerr was taking topics for the opening panel.

    influencersaudience shot

  3. reid and the guysNope, diversity didn’t come up on the first panel. Privacy didn’t either, despite an excellent suggestion from the audience. Instead it was a puff piece for “the most rapidly growing, most profitable, with the most happy customers that Kleiner Perkins has ever backed”. It’s four four four disruptions in one! I wonder if anybody mentioned the SF Weekly article on Farmvillains?

    Diversity didn’t come up on the next panel either, a love-fest with eight guys including Michael. Highlights included blatantly promoting Quora and angel investor Yossi Vardi’s insights that “The difference between a ‘super angel’ and a VC is like making love with a lover versus making love with the government.” Yes, Disrupt really is the kind of a place where an investor says “we will fuck you over” and the crowd is expected to go wild.

    Here’s panelist’s Mark Suster’s summary in What I *Would Have* Said:

    What do you get when you combine 7 panelist plus one moderator on to a stage for 30 minutes to talk about a serious topic?  Answer: Not much. And that was evident on today’s Angel vs. VC panel.

    Jessica Guynn covers it for the LA Times in ‘AngelGate’ disrupts TechCrunch conference but no ‘Jerry Springer’ moment Ryan Singel has more in Wired.

    And Greylock gave LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman $20 million to invest thanks to his track record including Digg and Zynga.

  4. Wait, some genuine news! And a few other insightful comments from Twitter:

    more highlights

    The Microsoft/Wordpress deal seems win/win/win to me, for both companies and for open source. Props to the guys in Redmond for deciding to throw in the towel, and Automattic and ToniSchneider (TechCrunch’s 2007 CEO of the year) for seizing the opportunity.

  5. GE’s known in the innovation community for their thoughtful approach to it. Alas it doesn’t seem like Beth Comstock got a chance to cover the cultural aspects, instead announcing a big investment in green energy. Scott Cook shared his recipe for startup success (select the right people, have a big dream/mission) ship/experiment/iterate/test) and lessons from Mint (you either disrupt or you get disrupted) but also doesn’t appear to have discussed culture. Or diversity.

    Some highlights from Twitter:

    Twitter discussion of Beth Comstock

  6. More news! Under intense grilling by TechCrunch’s Sarah Lacy, Facebook board member Peter Thiel says Facebook is undervalued at $30 billion, compared Facebook CEO Mark to Apple CEO Steve of the all-white-male executive staff. He also said that as long as Mark stays at Facebook, the company will be about building new products rather than making current ones work, satisfying customers, addressing security, or giving people privacy.

    I don’t think either Peter or Sarah (author of Women in Tech: Look Around the World and Stop Complaining) mentioned diversity. They also didn’t talk about the risks that anti-corporate activism and new competitors could drop Facebook’s valuation significantly. He did however announce a new initiative to pay kids to “stop out of school”, and favorably compared the Valley “positive sum” viewpoint to Hollywood.

    By the way in case you didn’t follow the links above, it was Peter who wrote The Diversity Myth. He’s also been reported to have given $1M to “immigration reduction” organization NumbersUSA.


    Update 3 p.m.: in the fourth TechCrunch post on Peter in the last few hours, MG Siegler says

    “The Yelp for cellphones will be Yelp. The Google for cellphones will be Google.”

    That was Clarium Capital President Peter Thiel talking to our own Sarah Lacy on stage during TechCrunch Disrupt today. His point was that Internet innovation today is much like innovation in the automobile industry in the 1950s and 1960s. That is, there isn’t much — it’s all about the big boys, in Thiel’s mind.

    Thiel kept coming back to this point during his talk. Given this, Sarah was especially curious about his early Facebook investment. While Thiel said that he believes that Facebook is currently undervalued at $30 billion, he would think twice about funding a startup like Facebook today. Again, he just doesn’t believe there’s going to be a lot that’s happening that isn’t dominated by the big boys.

    Jessica Guynn has more in the LA Times.

    From the archives, here’s Kara Swisher’s fascinating 2007 interview with Peter.

  7. influencers on twitterIt’s lunchtime now. Here’s a recent Twazzup snapshot of Twitter influencers, with Adria Richards of But You’re a Girl topping the list.

    Once everybody gets back there’s a talk from Dan on power, and then the start of the TechCrunch BattleField. Not sure who else is presenting, but at 3:30, it’s Montreal-based Shwowp, a tool to help you take control of your shopping history: organize it, share it and track how you influence others.

    Shwowp’s founders include Tara (@missrogue) Hunt. In her post on horsepigcow, Tara thanks the rest of the team: Yanik (lead developer), William (designer/front end developer), Joy (Architect), Jerome (CTO & Co-founder) and Cassandra (COO & Co-founder). Now that’s what I call awesome.

  8. Storify was one of the early presenters. Seems useful to me! Here’s a demo:

  9. Day 1 of Disrupt wraps up amidst a report from Om Malik of GigaOm that AOL is looking to acquire TechCrunch. Robert notes that Michael would want to sell for more than Jason, so maybe $40M. He ran into Heather in the parking lot but she wouldn’t comment.

    Jessica Guynn has more in the LA Times

    Tune in tomorrow!

  10. […] For part 1 of the series, please see The third wave and the agenda of awesome […]

  11. […] Over on our linkspam, jon wrote: Continuing to follow up on the Arrington “Stop blaming men” post, I’ve got a preview of this week’s TechCrunch Disrupt conference at TechCrunch, disrupted: the third wave meets the agenda of awesome. […]

  12. […] posts in the series: The third wave meets the anatomy of awesome, Changing the ratio, A public service announcement, and A celebration of disruptive women image […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *