#MotrinMoms: From Twitter to the NY Times in 24 hours.

Katja Presnal’s Motrin Ad Makes Moms Mad

Motrin’s “viral” video making fun of babywearing mothers — timed for the start of International Babywearing Week — has, much to their PR firms amazement, led to a backlash.  As Allyson Kaplan’s Motrin’s Pain: Viral Video Disaster on Fast Company’s Radical Tech describes:

The viral video worked in the sense that it went viral but not in the way the marketers of Motrin were hoping for. Just hours after the campaign launched moms began blogging, tweeting and posting Facebook updates about how offensive the new Motrin campaign is to mothers. Women were so angered by the video that it became one of the most popular subjects tweeted about this weekend on Twitter. Talk about a PR disaster. Over 100 blogs featured headlines such as “Motrin Makes Moms Mad” to “Motrin Giving Moms a Headache”.

Tweets on Twitter are flying across the screen by the second using the hashtag #motrinmoms. Tweets read “RU FREAKING KIDDING ME? So many things wrong with that I don’t know where to start,” said @thecouponcoup. “I am shocked by that Motrin ad. Count me in on the boycott,” said @blondeblogger. “They totally do not get us at all,” said @DealSeekingMom.

Gosh.  Who’d a thunk it?

Heather Chapman’s Moms outraged over Motrin’s new ad on The Mother Tongue has a nicely-highlighted version of the script*:

I mean, in theory it’s a great idea….
Supposedly, it’s a real bonding experience.
Plus, it totally makes me look like an official mom.
And so if I look tired and crazy, people will understand why.

Sarah Evans Motrin Moms: Social Media Fail Whale on Mashable, Andy Beal’s Motrin Faces Twitter Headache Over New Video Campaign on Marketing Pilgrim (with great comments including BigDaddy’s description of the likely “creative” process) have some good commentary on this as well.

Strangely, a lot of guys (and some women as well) don’t see why moms might be offended by this.  Dave Winer, for example, posted repeatedly on Twitter, calling the reaction “nonsense”, “inappropriate”, and “stupid” before looking like a tired, crazy, official guy line by pointing out that “men are victims of sexist ads too”.**  Whatever.

And I’m not sure if Amber Bryer-Wotte’s Profiles In Overreaction: #MotrinMoms on Culture11’s LadyBlog is typical of cultural conservative reactions,*** but I found it equally revealing.  For example:

Another complaint is that the voiceover in the ad says wearing a baby sling makes her feel like “an official mom.” This too is the source of much outrage.  But for pete’s sake, I’m 29 and I still don’t feel like an official grown up, much less can I conceive of myself as an official mom….

Here’s what bugs me most: If you’re on twitter, you’re a.) probably a youngish mom and therefore probably share some of my own insecurity about being a grown up and parenthood and b.) pretty clearly someone who wants to be considered trendy.  Get over yourself.

A dad in the comments helpfully adds “Unfortunately it impossible to not piss of moms, bloggers, or women with the hormones that result from pregnancy, delivery, or breast feeding. If you acknowledge them you upset them. If you ignore them you upset them.”  Nice.

More positively, Lisa Belkin’s Moms and Motrin, in the New York Times’ Motherlode blog, quotes advice from Peter Shankman, who she describes as “a public relations all-star who knows everything and then some about new media”:

I’m not siding with Motrin. They messed up, granted. I’m ok with that. Companies mess up all the time. They fix the problem, and it usually doesn’t make the radar screen. The problem is, Motrin happened to mess up at the expense, and in the face of, one of the most vocal, quickest-to-blog, “strongest-to-band-together-and-form-one-opinion-like-the-Borg” collectives out there – The Mommy-Blogging community.

Now I am NOT slagging on Mommy-Bloggers. Not in the slightest. Nor, am I saying they’re over-reacting to the commercial, which, by rights, was stupid and patronizing. What I AM saying though, is that Motrin will pay a MUCH bigger price, as opposed to if they’d messed up in front of say, “Construction-Worker-Bloggers.” Mommy-Bloggers are not a voice to be messed with, probably because they’re one of the most clearly identifiable voices on the web.

Indeed. Companies do repeatedly “mess up” with ads that disrespect and condescend to women.  While Peter might be okay with that, others aren’t.  Using social networks like Twitter, communities like “Mommy-bloggers” can respond swiftly and firmly — and, as the examples I’ve linked to illustrate, quickly get coverage beyond “the usual suspects” and into tech, marketing, and mainstream media blogs.   Other pro-woman, feminist, and womanist activists are presumably watching and learning.****

Lisa’s NY Times post also has an update from Kathy Widmer, a VP of Marketing at McNeil (the Johnson and Johnson subsidiary that makes Motrin), apologizing and expressing regret — and apparently this has gone out to the various bloggers as well.  Motrin and their PR agency may well be able to react effectively enough to keep this from permanently damaging their brands … we shall see.

In any case, whether or not guys land cultural conservatives like it, this is a powerful testimony to the power of social networks for rapid action.

From Twitter to the New York Times in about 24 hours.

All hail the power of Motrin Moms!

jon

* Update, 1:15 p.m.: actually it seems that the highlighted script was first published by Barb on Perfectly Natural Photography — in a post that also has a very good link roundup.

**  Thanks for sharing, Dave.  I must have missed the memo appointing you as the arbiter of what moms should and shouldn’t care about.  Y’know, at some point, people are likely to start asking whether your sexism introduces biases as well on other topics where you also see yourself as an expert.  But I digress.

*** Update, 1:55 p.m: Oops.  While Culture11 focuses on cultural conservatives, Amber’s a libertarian; see the discussion in the comment thread.  Apologies to Amber for the misdescription.

**** I hope civil liberties activists are as well: Twitter Vote Report also got traction with Momsrising and other Moms who blog, and as Motrin’s headache indicates, they’re a force to be reckoned with.

Originally published November 2009 as “MotrinMoms: From Twitter to the NY Times in 24 hours.  All hail the power of Mommybloggers!”.  In February I just discovered PunditMom (aka Joanne Bamberger’s) Don’t call me a mommyblogger on ZDNet, with a great explanation of why “mommyblogger” comes across as an insulting term.  My apologies to anybody I offended by my use of the term, and I’ll avoid it in the future.  I’ve edited it a few times since to remove other lingering uses the term.


Comments

9 responses to “#MotrinMoms: From Twitter to the NY Times in 24 hours.”

  1. Amber Bryer-Wotte Avatar
    Amber Bryer-Wotte

    I’m not a cultural conservative. And I’ve yet to see much of anything saying what, exactly, is offensive, condescending, or disrespectful about the ad. A lot of the young moms I know use the baby slings and a good number of them find that they result in back and shoulder pain.

    Some of them use them ’cause they look cool, some of them use them ’cause of the good baby bonding, some of them use them ’cause they’re more convenient than a stroller, and most of them use them for more than one of those reasons. That makes them no less painful. I don’t see why it’s patronizing.

    I love the power of social networks and I love the rapid response it enables. But I really just don’t get what the fuss is about, and I haven’t seen anyone explain it other in accusatory, non-substantive ways. By all means, illuminate me as to why it’s offensive.

  2. Amber Bryer-Wotte Avatar
    Amber Bryer-Wotte

    *other THAN in accusatory, non-substantive ways.

  3. Thanks for the response, Amber, and my apologies for mischaracterizing you as a cultural conservative. I had based this on Ladyblog’s self-description (“What’s wrong with modern woman’s culture?”) in the context of the statement on Culture11’s about page that “Our goal is to provide the most interesting perspectives on life in America as our nation, and the culturally conservative in particular, find themselves in a time of rapid change and uncertainty”. What would a better description be?

    And at this point, thousands of mothers and others have posted (on Twitter, blogs, and comments) the various reasons they find this offensive and disrespectful. Personally I thought Katja’s video and the highlighted script (originally due to Barb on Perfectly Natural Photography) made the case particularly effectively. The discussion in Andy’s thread also had several gems, for example BigDaddy’s observation that “I’m going out on a limb here, but the under tone is of disdain/contempt for motherhood” and Michelle MacPhearson’s comment

    It’s unfortunate that this campaign has trivialized the choices mothers make in raising their children. I think that’s the kicker and what has caused such backlash. The tone was patronizing, the content was factually wrong and, whats more, it belittled how/why women make the decisions they make regarding their kids. We make decisions on childrearing because of “fashion” or to look like “an official mom?”

    I don’t know how a company can overcome looking down their nose at customers….

    If none of those resonate with you, I’m not sure what else I could say to get you to look at things differently.

  4. Amber Bryer-Wotte Avatar
    Amber Bryer-Wotte

    I’m very libertarian and don’t at all consider myself a conservative, cultural or otherwise. My inclusion on LadyBlog is a nod to what is perceived as an alliance between conservatives and libertarians, but I’ve always considered the alliance to be one of convenience rather than one rooted in ideology, especially given what modern conservatism has become.

    To respond to what little I have seen, no, it doesn’t resonate with me in the least. I though it was an ad that took a humorous, conversational look at what is–for better or worse–considered to be a trendy new thing in child-rearing. It made me think, “Hey, that baby-sling thing has its pros and its cons, so if I try it, maybe I’ll stock up on Motrin first because it looks like it could be uncomfortable or difficult to get used to.”

    Among the pros in my mind? It’s trendy. If I’ve got to move a baby from point A to point B and I can choose a stroller, a baby sling, or a baby backpack thingie, all else being equal, I’m gonna go the trendy route, as would lots of other women. I don’t see what’s wrong with pointing that out, and I don’t think it trivializes the decision making process. If women didn’t “make decisions on childrearing because of ‘fashion’,” all the baby gear in the world would be the same color/pattern/etc.

    And as for looking like an official mom, I can’t tell you how many women I know who are around my age (29) who have kids who find it utterly surreal that they’re now parents. I don’t know a lot of first time moms who are super-duper confident in their momminess right off the bat; again, all things being equal, if there’s a product that makes me feel more confident–or makes me look more confident, which in turn makes a lot of women feel more confident–hells yeah, I’m gonna use that product.

    I have absolutely nothing against baby wearing. I have friends who swear by it, and I’ll probably do it myself when the time comes. The ONLY negative thing I’ve heard about them is that they take time to adjust to and that adjustment can be uncomfortable. So yeah, maybe I’ll need some over-the-counter pain reliever; I’m glad Motrin has made it okay to complain every once in awhile about the pain and seek some relief, even though I, like most mothers, plan to wear the inconveniences of motherhood like badges of honor.

    I still have no concept of why anyone thinks that the highlighted statements are condescending, and no idea why anyone would interpret that ad as looking down on women. I think it looks up at them and says “Hey, motherhood isn’t always easy, but you’re doing your best in an uncertain time. At the end of the day, take a load off an have a Motrin. You deserve it.” I see absolutely nothing wrong with that message. I think it’s great.

  5. Amber, as I read the difference in perspectives, it seems to me that the moms who are offended aren’t thinking of trendiness as part of the reason they’re choosing babywearing, don’t see it as part of an “official mom” uniform (or maybe don’t have the desire for an “official mom” uniform), and don’t see themselves as looking crazy. Instead, they see themselves as choosing babywearing because that’s really (not just “supposedly” and “in theory”) what’s best for their baby.

    While I realize you see things differently, put yourselves in their shoes for a moment, and imagine that was your worldview. In that case, would you view the ad as condescending and disrespectful?

  6. I can’t think of anything that changed my perspective on life more than becoming a mother. While I find it hard to imagine that someone couldn’t begin to relate to the backlash or even acknowlege the condescending tone, maybe it’s because Amber isn’t a mom…as I was reading her comments, I was thinking to myself, certainly she doesn’t have kids yet…

    I wear my daughter for so many reasons – it calms her, (for that matter it calms me) it helps me get more accomplished, it allows me to move through crowded or tight spaces more easily, and if done correctly it’s LESS painful than holding a baby on your hip. While the fabrics of carriers might be trendy, babywearing is not – it has been done worldwide for centuries and with documented benefits.

    There are many legitimate reasons moms get headaches, but this isn’t one of them! I had an issue with the Children’s Motrin ad as well, did you see it?

    Thanks, Jon, for this great summary!

  7. […] Twitter’s filled with highly-networked people into PR, marketing, social media, and blogging.  It’s got great viral propagation mechanisms like retweeting, hashtags, top searches, “Follow Friday”, the Monday night Journalist/PR chat, and so on.  In fact, right now Twitter’s quite possibly the most buzz-enabling place on the internet.  And the numbers you need to start getting attention are still surprisingly small; as the Motrin Moms showed us in November, a few thousand activists can leverage Twitter get a story into the New York Times in 24 hours. […]

  8. […] Don’t call me a mommyblogger is a good starting point, and I have a lot more links in #MotrinMoms: from Twitter to the New York Times in 24 hours.  More generally there are some intense debates about Twitter activism going on in the political […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *